Welcome

Mental Health Friday 2022-06-10 – Diogenes Syndrome

 

 

On Mental Health Friday, we post, in alphabetical order, one per week, information on mental health disorders. Mental Health Friday is for informational purposes only, and is in no way meant to diagnose, treat or cure any disease. Please do not self diagnose and seek professional help for what ails you.

Today’s Topic: Diogenes Syndrome

(To stay on page, right-click on links to open in a new tab)

Diogenes syndrome, also known as senile squalor syndrome, is a disorder characterized by extreme self-neglect, domestic squalor, social withdrawal, apathycompulsive hoarding of garbage or animals, plus lack of shame. Affected people may also display symptoms of catatonia.[1][2]

The condition was first recognized in 1966[3] and designated Diogenes syndrome by Clark et al.[4] The name derives from Diogenes of Sinope, an ancient Greek philosopher, a Cynic and an ultimate minimalist, who allegedly lived in a large jar in Athens. Not only did he not hoard, but he actually sought human company by venturing daily to the Agora. Therefore, this eponym is considered to be a misnomer.[5][6][7] Other possible terms are senile breakdownPlyushkin’s Syndrome (after the Gogol character),[5] social breakdown and senile squalor syndrome.[8] Frontal lobe impairment may play a part in the causation (Orrell et al., 1989).[9]

Presentation

Diogenes syndrome is a disorder that involves hoarding of rubbish and severe self-neglect. In addition, the syndrome is characterized by domestic squalor, syllogomaniasocial alienation, and refusal of help. It has been shown that the syndrome is caused as a reaction to stress that was experienced by the patient. The time span in which the syndrome develops is undefined, though it is most accurately distinguished as a reaction to stress that occurs late in life.[10][11]

In most instances, patients were observed to have an abnormal possessiveness and patterns of compilation in a disordered manner. These symptoms suggest damage to the prefrontal areas of the brain, due to its relation to decision making. In contrast, there have also been cases where the hoarded objects were arranged in a methodical manner, which may suggest a cause other than brain damage.

Although most patients have been observed to come from homes with poor conditions, and many had been faced with poverty for a long period of time, these similarities are not considered a definite cause to the syndrome. Research showed that some of the participants with the condition had solid family backgrounds as well as successful professional lives. Half of the patients were of higher intelligence level.[12] This indicates the Diogenes syndrome does not exclusively affect those experiencing poverty or those who had traumatic childhood experiences.

The severe neglect that they bring on themselves usually results in physical collapse or mental breakdown. Most individuals with the syndrome do not get identified until they face this stage of collapse, due to their predilection to refuse help from others.[4]

Personality traits that can be seen frequently in patients diagnosed with Diogenes syndrome are aggressiveness, stubbornness, suspicion of others, unpredictable mood swings, emotional instability and deformed perception of reality.[11] Secondary DS is related to mental disorders.[11] The direct relation of the patients’ personalities to the syndrome is unclear, though the similarities in character suggest potential avenues for investigation.[11]

Diagnosis

Individuals with Diogenes syndrome generally display signs of collectionism, hoarding, or compulsive disorder. Individuals who have had damage to the brain, particularly the frontal lobe, may be at more risk to developing the syndrome. The frontal lobes are of particular interest, because they are known to be involved in higher order cognitive processes, such as reasoningdecision-making and conflict monitoring. Diogenes syndrome tends to occur among the elderly. People with this disorder tend to have significant functional problems correlated with morbidity and mortality.[13]

Management

It is ethically difficult when it comes to dealing with diagnosed patients, for many of them deny their poor conditions and refuse to accept treatment. The main objectives of the doctors are to help improve the patient’s lifestyle and wellbeing, so health care professionals must decide whether or not to force treatment onto their patient.

In some cases, especially those including the inability to move, patients have to consent to help, since they cannot manage to look after themselves. Hospitals or nursing homes are often considered the best treatment under those conditions.

When under care, patients must be treated in a way in which they can learn to trust the health care professionals. In order to do this, the patients should be restricted in the number of visitors they are allowed, and be limited to one nurse or social worker. Some patients respond better to psychotherapy, while others to behavioral treatment or terminal care.[11]

Results after hospitalization tend to be poor. Research on the mortality rate during hospitalization has shown that approximately half the patients die while in the hospital. A quarter of the patients are sent back home, while the other quarter are placed in long-term residential care. Patients under care in hospitals and nursing homes often slide back into relapse or face death.

There are other approaches to improve the patient’s condition. Day care facilities have often been successful with maturing the patient’s physical and emotional state, as well as helping them with socialization. Other methods include services inside the patient’s home, such as the delivery of food.[11]

History

The origin of the syndrome is unknown, although the term “Diogenes” was coined by A. N. G. Clarke et al. in the mid‑1970s and has been commonly used since then. Diogenes syndrome was acknowledged more prominently as a media phenomenon in popular media rather than medical literature. The primary description of this syndrome has only been mentioned recently by geriatricians and psychiatrists.[3][4]

References

  1. ^ Cybulska, E; Rucinski, J (1986). “Gross Self-neglect in Old Age”. Br J Hosp Med36 (1): 21–23. PMID 3535960.
  2. ^ Rosenthal, M; Stelian, J; Wagner, J; Berkman, P (1999). “Diogenes syndrome and hoarding in the elderly: case reports”. The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences36 (1): 29–34. PMID 10389361.
  3. Jump up to:a b Macmillan, D; Shaw, P. (1966). “Senile breakdown in standards of personal and environmental cleanliness”BMJ2 (5521): 1032–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5521.1032PMC 1944569PMID 5919035.
  4. Jump up to:a b c Clark, AN; Mankikar, GD; Gray, I (1975). “Diogenes syndrome A clinical study of gross neglect in old age”. Lancet1 (7903): 366–368. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(75)91280-5PMID 46514.
  5. Jump up to:a b Cybulska, E (1998). “Senile Squalor: Plyushkin’s not Diogenes Syndrome”Psychiatric Bulletin22 (5): 319–320. doi:10.1192/pb.22.5.319.
  6. ^ (01-28-2006) by Alicia M. Canto, in: “Uso y abuso de Diógenes”
  7. ^ Marcos, M; Gomez-Pellin, MC. (2008). “A tale of a misnamed eponym: Diogenes syndrome”. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry23 (9): 990–1. doi:10.1002/gps.2005PMID 18752218.
  8. ^ Cooney, C; Hamid, W (1995). “Review: diogenes syndrome”Age and Ageing24 (5): 451–3. doi:10.1093/ageing/24.5.451PMID 8669353.
  9. ^ Orrell, M; Sahakian, B. (1991). “Dementia of frontal type”Psychol Med21 (3): 553–6. doi:10.1017/S0033291700022170PMID 1946843.
  10. ^ Hanon C, P. C. (2004). Diogenes Syndrome: A Transnosographic Approach. Encephale, 30 (4), 315-322.
  11. Jump up to:a b c d e f Reyes-Ortiz, C (2001). “Diogenes syndrome: The self-neglect elderly”. Comprehensive Therapy27 (2): 117–121. doi:10.1007/s12019-996-0005-6PMID 11430258.
  12. ^ Clark, AN; Mannikar (February 15, 1975). “Diogenes syndrome. A clinical study of gross neglect in old age”. The Lancet1 (7903): 366–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(75)91280-5PMID 46514.
  13. ^ Cipriani, Gabriele; Claudio Lucetti; Marcella Vedovello; Angelo Nuti (14 December 2012). “Diogenes syndrome in patients with dementia”Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience14 (4): 455–460. PMC 3553571PMID 23393422.
Share

Leave a Reply

New Report

Close

Skip to content
This Website is committed to ensuring digital accessibility for people with disabilitiesWe are continually improving the user experience for everyone, and applying the relevant accessibility standards.
Conformance status